By Alex Myers
Fox Sports’ fifth crack at covering the U.S. Open was almost universally viewed as a success. Even those involved would be the first to say the network has come a long way since Chambers Bay in 2015. But while TV critics could probably find a few things to nitpick other than the always present “More golf shots, less commercials!” demand (To be fair, Fox went nearly an hour without a single ad during the final stretch), there’s one thing fans couldn’t say on Sunday.

“They showed too much Tiger Woods!”

A small, but vocal crowd chants this refrain during almost every PGA Tour event—in particular, the ones when Woods isn’t contending. While their claims that Woods is shown a disproportionate amount certainly have merit, they never seem to grasp that most people want to watch the 15-time major champ no matter his position on the leader board. But Fox, at least for one week, bucked that trend.

The website Classic TV Sports has been tracking all the final-round shots shown at golf’s four major championships since the start of the 2014 season. The site’s Jeff Haggar has meticulously kept these records while being consistent in using approximately five-hour windows. On Sunday, he monitored this from 5 p.m. ET until the final putt was holed by Justin Rose at 9:31, and a couple of things jump out.

First, Fox showed 317 shots during that time period, which comes out to 1.17 shots per minute. That’s actually slightly below the 1.2 average of the 22 majors that have been tracked and down from last year’s 1.28 number on Fox. In comparison, this year’s Masters on CBS was at 1.38, but the PGA Championship, which was also on CBS, came in at only 1.14.

More important to this post, however, is how many of those 317 shots were hit by Tiger Woods. And the answer is. . . drumroll, please. . . five. Yep, 5. Out of 317.

OK, so this number needs a lot of contexts. For one, Tiger teed off two-and-a-half hours before the final pairing of Gary Woodland and Rose. He began the day 11 shots off the lead and then bogeyed four of his first six holes to become completely irrelevant before a late rally to shoot 69. So five shots were actually more than enough for someone who finished T-21, especially when you consider Jason Day shot the same Sunday score and finished in the same place and wasn’t shown once. Or Chez Reavie, who played along Brooks Koepka in the penultimate group, started and finished T-3, and only had three more of his shots shown than Woods during that window. (According to Classic TV Sports, the trio of Woodland, Koepka and Rose combined for 204 or 64 per cent of all the shots shown during the window.)

That being said, it was still a surprisingly low number. Given Woods’ numerous absences and missed cuts in majors since 2014 when this data began being compiled, it’s hard to find great comparisons. In fact, this was the first Fox-broadcasted U.S. Open in which Woods has played on the weekend. But the two most similar situations occurred in Tiger’s two previous Masters appearances before winning this year—2015 and 2018—both, obviously, carried by CBS.

In 2015, Woods played in the third-to-last group but shot 73 to tumble to T-17. Yet, nearly half of those shots (35) were still aired. In his next Masters start and his first appearance since coming back from back fusion surgery in 2017, Tiger played in the 20th-to-last pairing, shot 69, finished T-32 and still had 18 of his shots shown. Only five golfers had that many of their shots shown during Fox’s final window at Pebble Beach.

Right or wrong, Fox clearly made a choice to limit the number of shots shown by Woods on Sunday, even airing his closing birdie on tape some five minutes late. Of course, the network would rather show him in contention next year.

The post Fox’s Sunday U.S. Open coverage featured Tiger Woods (a lot) less than usual, according to these numbers appeared first on Golf Digest Middle East.

What do we know about the U.S. Open, the year’s second major? We know stereotypes—it’s the hardest major. The winning score tends to be close to even par. It’s designed as a “true test” of golf, requiring more variety and creativity than your average putting contest of a PGA Tour event. And, of course, we know the USGA mucks things up to make it artificially difficult on the poor golfers—growing out the rough, tightening the fairways, drying up the greens, turning 900-yard par 5s into par 3s, etc., all to preserve their precious “integrity of par.”

All of these things are true, except when they’re not. Sometimes Brooks Koepka shoots sixteen under. Sometimes Rory does, too. Sometimes Tiger does too, almost. Sometimes the course is just kind of difficult, but the greens are made of extra large Tacoma beach pebbles instead of grass. Sometimes instead of thick rough, they just pick a course that looks like a desert, and Donald Trump gets mad on Twitter…25 times.

Exceptions included, one fact remains constant: Players get mad at the USGA, and the USGA doesn’t care. On some secret level, I suspect they might even enjoy the provocation. The USGA is a troll, and not the fairytale kind that tries to eat the farmer’s goats—they’re the type of troll that subconsciously craves a reaction, and will stop at nothing to engender chaos in the staid ranks of professional golf, intentionally or otherwise.

This year’s U.S. Open will be held next week at Shinnecock Hills Golf Club in Great Gatsbyland, Long Island, and because I could never dream of matching Guy Yocom’s beautiful description of the course, I’m just going to paste it here:

[divider] [/divider]

WATCH NOW: WHAT’S AT STAKE AT THE U.S. OPEN AT SHINNECOCK

[divider] [/divider]

Shinnecock is unique. Playing to a par of 70, the course at its best is stark, mostly exposed and a bit wild, in mid-summer a gold and pale-green throwback to seaside golf at its most original. Its fairways, no two of which run parallel, are a mix of flattish, bending runs and subtle roller coasters. Its many bunkers, some there for beauty but most strategically positioned, are a little evil. The course is sand-based and bouncy, naturally fast and firm, and almost always wind-swept. Its four par 3s are staggeringly diverse.

Also, per Yocom, the USGA has altered it in recent months in order to avoid the tragedy of Erin Hills last year, when the god of wind abandoned them and Brooks Koepka made lots of birdies. (There’s a rumor going around that Mike Davis, USGA executive director, even hired a local shaman to teach him an ancient wind dance, and that video of his fruitless efforts could come out any day.)

And the players are already wary. Phil Mickelson, while praising the course set-up on one hand, had some barbs ready for the USGA:

Q. Do you think 7 at Shinnecock is a good hole?

PHIL MICKELSON: I think it’s a great hole until the USGA gets a hold of it.

Q. When you say that, are you concerned that that could be the case this time around as well?

PHIL MICKELSON: I’m concerned every time they get a hold of it, yeah.

And here was Rory McIlroy on his favorite organisation:

“I think the USGA thinks that we’re better than we actually are, if that makes sense. I think they over think it. I think that and I don’t want to single out Mike Davis here, I think it’s a collective thought process. We were talking about this yesterday. They sort of, I don’t think it should be as much of an exact science to set up golf course as it is…they over think it…it’s been a very reactionary few years.”

Ross Kinnaird
USGA chief Mike Davis.

These may sound like tame reactions, but they’re as tame as the slight rumble in the ground that precedes a Richter Scale-shattering earthquake. These words are harbingers and premonitions, and in a week’s time when the first bloodied players come staggering in to the clubhouse, a few of them will go Full Horschel.

Full Horschel is when you become super petulant and blame the conditions for your round, and then pretend your complaints are actually “for the fans.” Full Horschel is when you get battered by the Chambers Bay gauntlet and say things like this:

Jamie Squire

‘’I think a lot of players, and I’m one of them, have lost some respect for the USGA and this championship this year.”

Or you can go full Brendan Steele, who once implied that a player was going to sue the USGA for their anchored putting ban, and carried the torch of his grievance all the way to Erin Hills (and likely beyond).

Or you can go full Adam Scott, who has some very polite but also very pointed remarks about the USGA’s missteps before Erin Hills, or you can go full Kevin Na and make a video kvetching about the course where Koepka was about to shoot 16-under.

The examples are endless, and this is the hidden brilliance of the USGA. The things they do may be wrong, but they function as a bright spotlight, exposing the most sanctimonious, whine-prone players in the sport. The fact that Davis and his organization have stumbled their way from controversy to controversy for three straight years, with damage control so bad that it makes Hillary Clinton look like Chesley Sullenberger, only makes the whole situation funnier.

And while it can definitely take a human toll—the terrible greens at Chambers arguably cost Dustin Johnson the 2015 Open, and a bizarre penalty situation nearly did the same in 2016—it’s all very on brand. Here I want to make a key distinction: In order for a troll to be a troll, a troll doesn’t need to know it’s a troll. Regardless of the USGA’s intentions, they never fail to antagonise, and by doing so they illuminate the extremely selfish nature of a certain kind of golfer—the kind who flips out when things aren’t perfect.

The best part about the whole dynamic is that the players aren’t afraid to say whatever they want. It’s the kind of thing that would never happen on the PGA Tour, because as Steele pointed out last year, the USGA can’t exclude them from the tournament, and therefore has no real power. The only thing they control is the course and the rules, but my God, do they get their money’s worth!

As someone who believes that golf is not quite weird enough, I hope they never change, and I hope when the players arrive at Shinnecock next week, they find rotating greens, vanishing holes, and 12 feet of dense fescue on the tee boxes. It’s time for the USGA to embrace its inner troll—these are the days of entropy, and they are the unwitting horsemen of the golf apocalypse.

The post U.S. Open 2018: The USGA almost always gets the reaction it wants out of players appeared first on Golf Digest Middle East.